RE: Mild Silver Protein safety:

Medical Journal Mild silver protein is safe because it has been used since 1902, which is over 100 years. Because of its International distribution, that means millions of people worldwide have used Mild silver protein with no side effects.

It is the yellow journalism strawman approach that would say that no one should never use a car, because the yellow journalist states that they (the yellow journalist) once had an accident with a car, or they knew of someone who once had an accident with a car. You have a greater chance of being struck by lightning, than of contracting argyria (light greyish colouring of skin, eyes, or mucous membranes) from Mild silver protein. Yet pawns of the multi-national drug Companies, stupid people, and meanspirited people would tell you not to ever drive a car because they had, or knew of, someone who had an accident with a car.

An even more relevant example would be to say that:
"No one should play golf", because someone knew a person who was struck by lightning while playing golf. Yet there are millions of golfers worldwide who have "never" been struck by lightning. (Common sense is not so common it seems, especially when people are typing away on the Internet).

Always remember that "millions" of people took Mild silver protein worldwide for over the past 100 years safely.

Our formula is based on the Original 1938 Medical Journal formulas that the MD's used, which gave the results "before" penicillin and the sulpha drugs were even invented by the multi-national drug companies, and before the takeover of our Food and Drug supply by the government.

Our type of Mild silver protein has been used by MDs for over 100 years, with repeatedly reported usage "and" listing in the Medical Journals from 1919 to circa 1947, and as late as 1978 in Europe.

RE: Promoters, ignorant, stupid, and meanspirited people, people with their own Corporate drug agenda, agents and pawns of the multi-national Drug Companies, and scam sites try to denigrate (bash) Mild Silver Protein:

The silver user must beware of claims made by the above types of people, Promoters of weak (under 500 ppm silver), and scam Sites (that "look" scientifically professional ((but are not))), and Sites that are "posing" as "independent" Sites.

These scam Sites will also say that:

1.) These scam sites will say that Mild silver protein is not colloidal silver (though it has been the "only" colloidal silver listed in the Medical Journals as colloidal silver for over 50 years).

2.) These scam sites will lie by inferring 20 paltry (measly) particles of silver have a greater surface area than 5000 particles! Ask yourself: Do 20 regular compact car tires have a larger surface area than "5,000" normal family size car tires? Of course not. But they trick the public by saying and inferring that their low 20 ppm (parts per million) has more relative surface area "without" telling the public that Invive "at 5000" ppm has 250 times more surface area than their 20 ppm.

Here are the actual "mathematical" proofs (not just misleading typing and misleading graphs), that proves "mathematically":

Our Invive 5000 ppm has 250 times larger "total" surface area than promoters scam 20 ppm:

1.) The "total" surface area of all 20 pieces of promoters 20 ppm increased surface area = 20 * p (.01 m) ² = 0.00628 square microns. (m is the symbol for a micron = 10^-6 m, and p = 3.1416. The diameter of a single silver particle is 0.01 m).

2.) The "total" surface area of 1 of INVIVE's .005 to .015 particles is = p (.01 m) ² = 0.000314 square microns, for a spherical silver particle of average diameter 0.01 m.

3.) INVIVE'S Total particle surface area in one dose of 5000 = 5000 * p (.01 m )² = 1.5708 square microns.

4.) INVIVE’S 5000 ppm silver has 250 times more surface area than promoters 20 ppm silver

5.) Therefore our 5000 ppm has 250 times the effectiveness of their 20 ppm. The comparison is for a fixed spherical size of silver particle, since there are many promoters of silver in the range of 20 ppm.

6.) Effectiveness can only be compared for a fixed particle size. It is not true that producing more particles of smaller size to get a greater surface area for the same ppm of silver will necessarily increase effectiveness. This is especially true of very small particles, where the smallest sizes are ineffective against pathogens. The silver user should beware of claims of large surface area at low ppm.

7.) To have equivalent surface area to Invive 5000, the promoters would have to manufacture a silver particle size 250 times smaller at 20 ppm. This is because "the" surface area relative to the silver mass is inversely proportional to the particle diameter. This would be a particle of 0.04 nm (nanometers) in diameter. Such a size could not be made, and if it could, is too small to be effective against pathogens.

8.) Analysis of the silver promoters site for 20 ppm weak silver, has determined that their data is suspect as deliberately misrepresentative of the facts that their own site presents for the small particle size they are claiming in their comparison table. Their lab results state an average size of 18.04 nm but show a graph implying a size of 0.678 nm which seems very small and proves inconsistent via their own data because the graph is way below 18.04 nm.

Theirs is an absurd lying deception that they perpetrate on the public to sell their weak 20 ppm solution, while posing as an independent site.

To address disease you need 5,000 ppm and that is "proven" time and time again by achieving and recording the actual bacterial and viral loads of the patients (that are below detectable) after taking the 5,000 ppm. Their 20 ppm is worthless in the bloodstream because 1 teaspoon (5 cc) of 20 ppm is diluted down to less than 1/100 of 1 ppm by everyone's 6,000 cc of blood.

That is Grade 6 mathematics. Divide 5 cc of 20 ppm into 6,000 cc of blood and you will get a dilution factor of 1,200 times 6,000 cc divided by 5 cc= 1,200 times.

Then divide 20 ppm by 1,200 times= 20 divided by 1,200= 0.01666666666 and you will readily see that the 20 ppm reduces down to less than 1/100 of 1 ppm, which is a worthless strength inside the body. The Medical Journal Results confirm this, by actually taking various concentrations of silver in vitro (in the petrie dish), and testing the effectiveness against pathogens. With the exception of yeast, one needs to use at least 4 ppm of silver in the petrie dish to kill most pathogens, and therefore less than 1/100 of 1 ppm will not be effective. Again: 1/100 of 1 ppm is what a 20 ppm dilutes down to in the bloodstream, which is a worthless strength internally.

Re the stabilization of Mild Silver Protein:

Mild silver protein introduces a specially formulated protein stabilizer that permits much higher ppm values to be stored safely in a bottle, without precipitating out. When ingested in the body, the mild silver protein releases the colloidal silver at the concentrations required to treat the pathogens. Without the stabilizer, colloidal silver concentrations required to deal with pathogens cannot be achieved in the body without drinking many gallons of colloidal silver. The dollar cost would be astronomical.

Re the adsorption rate of Invive:

As a rebuttal to the promoters: Even "if" a 5000 ppm had only 20 % adsorption rate (which it does not), that 20% of 5,000 ppm will "STILL" be/result in 1,000 ppm strength, as compared to the promoters' weak 20 ppm.

20 particles of silver attacking the pathogens, or 5,000 particles attacking the pathogens.

The reason we use a protein is that you have to increase the viscosity of the liquid medium in order to hold up "5,000" pieces of silver.

The same way one would have to increase the viscosity of a salt solution, in order to suspend 5,000 grains of salt in a glass vs. just 20 grains of salt in a glass.

If we did not put 5,000 pieces of silver into our solution, we would not use a protein. And could make a silver just like theirs without a protein.

But we put in 5,000 pieces of silver because that is the amount needed to get one's blood concentration (using 1 teaspoon of silver) to at least 4.6 ppm, in order to be effective against disease.

A teaspoon of a 20 ppm once diluted down by everyone's 6000 cc of blood results in a less than 1/100 ppm in the bloodstream, which is a useless strength in the body against all pathogens except yeast.

A sites that sells or lists a 20 ppm silver, (though it tries to make itself look like an unbiased site), is "not" an independent site as it tries to portray itself.

They all sell a weak 20 ppm solution, but try to give the impression that 20 ppm is effective internally against disease, when in fact the silver that cured 650 diseases since the 1940s has been strengths "above" 1000 ppm, and not a weak, paltry 20 ppm.

They are trying to say that 20 bullets (pieces of silver) ((ppm))) per million pieces of H20 (water),

have the same ability as 5,000 bullets (pieces of silver ((ppm))) per million pieces of H20.

It is Scientifically "impossible" for 20 ppm (pieces of silver) to have the same effectiveness as 1,000 or 2,000 or 5,000 ppm (pieces of silver), because "each" particle of silver has to interfere with the enzymes of "each" piece of bacteria or virii.

Therefore 20 ppm (pieces of silver) can only attack (attach themselves) to 20 bacteria, whereas 5,000 ppm (pieces of silver) can attack (attach themselves) to 5,000 bacteria.

If you wish to see true "Scientific Data" and not just a bunch of typing see:

and then scroll up and down through "actual" in vitro studies against actual pathogens.

In the 20 ppm promoters comparison tables, Invive's type of mild silver protein was not even allowed to be included for comparison. They state:

1.) This is because "if" the Invive type of Mild Silver Protein "was" considered for use against disease by them, they would have to admit that the pathogen killing power of a 5,000 ppm solution far exceeds the pathogen killing power of a 20 ppm solution.

2.) Plus they would have to report our 5000 ppm consistently coming in at "over" 5000 ppm, so that "our" customers get more for their purchase instead of less. The same holds true for "all" of our solutions, whereby:

We insure that there is "always" ppm that is just "above" the stated ppm (parts per million), and "never" below the stated ppm, as other manufacturers are evidenced to cheat the public with less ppm than is actually on their label.

The above 2 reasons"That" is why they will not test our INVIVE (Argentoproteiniumitetronic) Silver.

See the actual Scientific Data on our type of Silver from "truly" independent labs by just

you will see that Data is from the "top", leading "Scientific Institutions" of 2 nations (Canada and the USA), and

which is the date we first put out the information on Silver for you. There is even a paper from the leading Scientist Emeritus of the NIH, (National Institute of Health) Dr. William Burgdorfer, the discoverer of Lyme Disease, who had the spirochete named after himself as Borrilia Burgdorferi. You "cannot" get any higher recommendation that that anywhere in the world.

This is because way back in 1995 we had the truth about silver that worked, and proved it by putting up the actual "scientific" studies of our type of Silver.

This is the proof that "ALL" of the other Silver distributors are lying about their products,

because way back in 1995 before they even knew about "any" form of Silver, (let alone our Medical Journal Silver),

that had tested our type of Silver "independently" to "prove" that it and higher ppm (parts per million) worked best.

The above link is the "actual" 1995 "Scientific" data that proved our statements on Silver.

Since then hundreds of distributors have been typing away putting up Web Sites

"any" "independent" Scientific Data to substantiate their outrageous claims that their silver is the best.

Please do not be misled by all the lies of the newcomers since 1995, who are "all" just typing away, just making up lies, without having any of the "leading" recognized "independent" institutions do tests of their products to show you the actual killing effect on the pathogens via actual "Scientific Studies", and instead just type up endless lies and hype.

By following the rules of Science and Physics that confirm silver is allopathic, and by following the actual calculations above:

This is "how" you will know who to believe, since your very life and health is dependant on your making an informed decision.

to see an "overview of the ppm" (parts per million) strengths required for pathogens groups,

and please also click here for the D.D.R. (Doctors Desk Reference):

http://www.1stcenturychristian.com/bhealthy/Ag-therapy.html

to see the actual D.D.R. (Doctors' Desk Reference) which uses only the 5,000 ppm.

See what the actual MDs themselves (past ((1940s)) and present ((2000s))) subscribe to, and used, and continue to use, as Protocols, in the usage of 5,000 ppm silver.

Here again is the overall guideline chart:

http://www.invive.com/prices.html

in order to see an "overview of the ppm" (parts per million) strengths required, instead of having to read all the 50 pages in the DDR pathogens groups.

Our goal is your well-being.